<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>Nathan Dial's adventures in Interweb Land - web</title>
    <link>http://www.nathandial.com/</link>
    <description>Programming, food, family, la vida web, blah, blah, blah</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.4.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:46:00 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Relavance is the best SEO (Redux)</title>
    <link>http://www.nathandial.com/index.php?/archives/3-Relavance-is-the-best-SEO-Redux.html</link>
            <category>web</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.nathandial.com/index.php?/archives/3-Relavance-is-the-best-SEO-Redux.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.nathandial.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=3</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathandial.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=3</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Nathan Dial)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;In the past, I wrote an opinionated blog rant about how SEO is overrated, and how if you want to rise in search engine rankings, your only focus should be building a good product. I was looking for opinions or echoes on the net, and I found out that my radical ideas about Search Engine Optimization have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum5/6285.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;WebmasterWorld discussion on SEO&quot;&gt;already occured to others&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having spent the better part of a year now working in the aggregation end of a major &lt;a title=&quot;Indeed.com (job search)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.indeed.com&quot;&gt;search engine&lt;/a&gt;, I ... I really have to take that back.&amp;#160; I mean, yes, being relevant is a huge boon to your search ranking, but being crawlable is necessary before you even get into the index at all! If you have a convoluted POST-based navigation or you require Flash, Acrobat or even JavaScript to navigate your site, search engines will have an uphill struggle to index your content.&amp;#160; Technology to do so is improving, but the bread-and-butter of search indexing is still GET-based.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interestingly, making the right decisions to get crawled well, will also help you make good accessibility decisions, too. Have you ever looked at &lt;a title=&quot;NoScript Firefox plugin&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://noscript.net&quot;&gt;NoScript&lt;/a&gt;? It&#039;s a firefox plugin that disables all JavaScript by default.&amp;#160; It&#039;s troublesome to manually enable scripting for new sites, but in exchange you get to have very high confidence that you won&#039;t get remotely pwned by a rogue website. And if you&#039;re optimizing a site for accessibility/SEO, it also helps you test and see how your site performs to the average search indexing bot (or browser for the blind, or low-end mobile browser, etc.)&amp;#160; It doesn&#039;t have to look pretty with NoScript, but if it&#039;s not browsable without Javascript enabled, it&#039;s not as indexable as it could be.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are obviously inappropriate SEO moves, like packing keywords or spamming links, that not only don&#039;t work in the long run, they&#039;re counterproductive, because resources that go into temporary, artificial ranking boosts are resources that could be directed into relevance. Or heck, into paid search advertising. It&#039;s kind of expensive, but if you need to get your name out, paid search works.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathandial.com/index.php?/archives/3-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>